Analysis of Appointments Pace at 100 Days
Overall, President Trump’s nominations trail previous administrations by six weeks, including President Reagan’s pace. Now, President Trump has the fewest nominations, fewest confirmations in 50 years.
White House processing of credentials and the Senate deliberations continue to lag behind those in previous administrations.
On critical leadership positions, President Trump lags far behind President Obama’s pace.
|Tracking 970 appointed positions requiring Senate confirmation and comparing them to expectations based on the previous three transitions:||Tracking 221 critical leadership positions requiring Senate confirmation and comparing them to expectations based on the previous three transitions.|
Trump nominations continue to stagnate while previous administrations have takeoff. On pace to fewest nominations in 40 years at end of 100 days.
|Stand Up: -56%
Current performance lags far behind previous administrations.
|Confirmations: -48%||Breakdown of Critical Leadership Positions|
|Previous administrations nearly twice as many confirmations by now. On pace to have the fewest confirmations in 40 years.||
|Last Updated: 4/30/2017 @ 8:30 AM EST|
See our Appointments page for more detailed information and projects out to the 100 days.
The White House Transition Project documents the pace at which a new administration fills out the American executive branch through its appointments power. WHTP measures the pace of appointments in four ways. First, we track 970 presidential appointments requiring Senate confirmation (known as “PAS” positions). For these appointments, we track the pace of nominations and the pace of confirmations, measuring both against a projected historical average based on the three previous administrations. Second, on these 970 PAS positions, WHTP measures the differences between the vetting process in the White House and the process in the Senate to assess the contributions of each to the overall process. Third, WHTP identifies and tracks a core of 221 leadership positions critical to the functions of government. These positions include those concerned with national security, managing the economy, managing the executive agencies, and carrying through on key agenda items. We believe that successfully filling out this second group of positions effectively “stands up” the American executive. Fourth, WHTP assesses the pace of fully standing up the critical leadership positions, including both presidential nominations and those already in place on inauguration day.
WHTP reports both these results every 5 days. See our Appointments page for more detailed information.
For the 2017 cycle, the White House Transition Project and our partners at Rice University’s Baker Institute and the National Archives have presented a series of conferences covering a range of issues associated with presidential transitions, including a conference focused on handling a confrontation in the South China Sea that resembles the actual conflict that is ongoing in this part of the world.
The White House Transition Project in coordination with our partners in the Moody Series on Presidential Leadership presents relevant content to professional and academic audiences. At our October 2016 event at the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library we produced a live discussion panel simulation similar to the events that transpired in the South China Sea only weeks before. See how our expert panel managed the crisis scenario.